<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>GeekTimeLinux &#187; Fedora Core</title>
	<atom:link href="http://geektimelinux.com/category/Distributions/fedora-core/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://geektimelinux.com</link>
	<description>All Things Linux</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 18:53:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Red Hat Is Ready for High-Performance Computing</title>
		<link>http://geektimelinux.com/2007/11/15/red-hat-is-ready-for-high-performance-computing/</link>
		<comments>http://geektimelinux.com/2007/11/15/red-hat-is-ready-for-high-performance-computing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 01:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tony</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Distributions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fedora Core]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Discussion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geektimelinux.com/2007/11/15/red-hat-is-ready-for-high-performance-computing/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(Via Linux Today.)
Linux-Watch: &#8220;Red Hat may be not be a super-computer company, but with its just-announced partnership with Platform Computing, it is ready to deliver the enterprise-grade high-performance computing goods&#8230;&#8221;
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Via <a href="http://linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2007-11-15-021-26-NW-HE-RH">Linux Today</a>.)</p>
<p><b>Linux-Watch:</b> &#8220;Red Hat may be not be a super-computer company, but with its just-announced partnership with Platform Computing, it is ready to deliver the enterprise-grade high-performance computing goods&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://geektimelinux.com/2007/11/15/red-hat-is-ready-for-high-performance-computing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Red Hat Global Desktop to appear in November</title>
		<link>http://geektimelinux.com/2007/10/12/red-hat-global-desktop-to-appear-in-november/</link>
		<comments>http://geektimelinux.com/2007/10/12/red-hat-global-desktop-to-appear-in-november/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 23:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tony</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Distributions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fedora Core]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geektimelinux.com/2007/10/12/red-hat-global-desktop-to-appear-in-november/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(Via DesktopLinux.com.)
When Red Hat announced its upcoming Linux desktop at its annual summit in May, the company predicted the Red Hat Global Desktop would be out by September. Now, delayed a bit, the new desktop Linux will be appearing in November,
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Via <a href="http://www.desktoplinux.com/news/NS6584091276.html">DesktopLinux.com</a>.)</p>
<p>When Red Hat announced its upcoming Linux desktop at its annual summit in May, the company predicted the Red Hat Global Desktop would be out by September. Now, delayed a bit, the new desktop Linux will be appearing in November,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://geektimelinux.com/2007/10/12/red-hat-global-desktop-to-appear-in-november/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is it time to give Red Hat some respect?</title>
		<link>http://geektimelinux.com/2007/10/04/is-it-time-to-give-red-hat-some-respect/</link>
		<comments>http://geektimelinux.com/2007/10/04/is-it-time-to-give-red-hat-some-respect/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 22:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tony</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Distributions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fedora Core]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geektimelinux.com/2007/10/04/is-it-time-to-give-red-hat-some-respect/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(Via Open Source.)

Red Hat is the Rodney Dangerfield of open source. (To which the cynic responds, &#8220;yeah, it&#8217;s dead.&#8221;
It don&#8217;t get no respect. We talk here a lot about Microsoft and Novell, about Sun and IBM. Red Hat just keeps plugging away.
Red Hat reported a 64% rise in profits yesterday. Revenues were up 28%. Business Week [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Via <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/zdnet/open-source/~3/165215322/">Open Source</a>.)</p>
<p>
<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-1496" href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/open-source/?attachment_id=1496" title="Rodney Dangerfield"><img align="right" src="http://blogs.zdnet.com/open-source/images/rodney-dangerfield.jpg" alt="Rodney Dangerfield" title="Rodney Dangerfield" /></a>Red Hat is the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rodney_Dangerfield">Rodney Dangerfield </a>of open source. (To which the cynic responds, &#8220;yeah, it&#8217;s dead.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>It don&#8217;t get no respect.</strong> We talk here a lot about Microsoft and Novell, about Sun and IBM. Red Hat just keeps <a href="http://www.redhat.com/about/news/prarchive/2007/secondquarter.html">plugging away</a>.</p>
<p>Red Hat reported a <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&amp;sid=aFXlE1Am3bC8&amp;refer=news">64% rise in profits </a>yesterday. Revenues were up 28%. <em>Business Week</em> called it a &#8220;<a href="http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D8RSSGUO0.htm">surge</a>.&#8221; I think they meant that as a compliment.</p>
<p>But the stock can&#8217;t seem to get out of its own way. JMP Securities rates it a &#8220;<a href="http://www.newratings.com/analyst_news/article_1619315.html">market perform</a>.&#8221; RBC Capital Markets calls it a &#8220;<a href="http://www.newratings.com/analyst_news/article_1618519.html">sector perform</a>.&#8221; If you put $100 into both Red Hat and Microsoft at the start of the year, your Microsoft is doing better. Your Red Hat is worth <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?client=ob&amp;q=RHT">$85</a>.</p>
<p><span id="more-465"></span> </p>
<p>While open source is considered a very sexy business, Red Hat does not <a href="http://www.lyricsondemand.com/onehitwonders/imtoosexylyrics.html">do sexy</a>. They sell Linux subscriptions to businesses. Their efforts to diversify have been only minimally successful. Slow growth at JBOSS has <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/investor/content/sep2007/pi20070926_944171.htm?chan=top+news_top+news+index_investing">S&amp;P rating Red Hat as only a &#8220;hold.&#8221;</a> Can it do better with <a href="http://www.metamatrix.com/pages/products/mm_enterprise.htm">Metamatrix</a>?</p>
<p>This may be the most inconvenient truth. Maybe enterprise open source is no sexier than enterprise anything else. Selling stuff to big businesses will get your kids through school, but it won&#8217;t get you on the <a href="http://www.people.com/people/package/0,,20034523,00.html">Most Beautiful People </a>list.</p>
<p>But if we wanted to do that we would have gone into the drama club, or majored in TV at journalism school.</p>
<p>So is it time to give Red Hat <a href="http://weblog.infoworld.com/openresource/archives/2007/06/red_hat_linux_v.html">some respect</a>?</p>
<div id="polls-53" class="wp-polls">
<form id="polls_form_53" action="/open-source/feedburner.php" method="post">
<input type="hidden" name="poll_id" value="53" />
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Time to give Red Hat some respect?</strong></p>
<div id="polls-53-ans" class="wp-polls-ans">
<ul class="wp-polls-ul">
<li><label for="poll-answer-171"><br />
<input type="radio" id="poll-answer-171" name="poll_53" value="171" /> They make money, don&#8217;t they?</label></li>
<li><label for="poll-answer-172"><br />
<input type="radio" id="poll-answer-172" name="poll_53" value="172" /> They sell Linux, don&#8217;t they?</label></li>
<li><label for="poll-answer-173"><br />
<input type="radio" id="poll-answer-173" name="poll_53" value="173" /> Their sales are barely a half-bill a year, aren&#8217;t they?</label></li>
<li><label for="poll-answer-174"><br />
<input type="radio" id="poll-answer-174" name="poll_53" value="174" /> They shoot horses, don&#8217;t they?</label></li>
</ul>
<p style="text-align: center;">
<input type="button" name="vote" value="   Vote   " class="Buttons" onclick="poll_vote(53);" onkeypress="poll_result(53);" />
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="#ViewPollResults" onclick="poll_result(53); return false;" onkeypress="poll_result(53); return false;" title="View Results Of This Poll">View Results</a></p>
</div>
</form>
</div>
<div id="polls-53-loading" class="wp-polls-loading"><img src="http://blogs.zdnet.com/open-source/wp-content/plugins/polls/images/loading.gif" width="16" height="16" alt="Loading ..." title="Loading ..." class="wp-polls-image" />&nbsp;Loading &#8230;</div>
<p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/zdnet/open-source/~4/165215322" height="1" width="1"/></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://geektimelinux.com/2007/10/04/is-it-time-to-give-red-hat-some-respect/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vixta.Forget vista!</title>
		<link>http://geektimelinux.com/2007/10/04/vixtaforget-vista/</link>
		<comments>http://geektimelinux.com/2007/10/04/vixtaforget-vista/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 22:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tony</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Distributions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fedora Core]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geektimelinux.com/2007/10/04/vixtaforget-vista/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(Via Newsvine &#8211; linux.)
Vixta.org is a Fedora-based Linux distribution designed to be user-friendly and eye-catching, similar in look and feel to Windows Vista. Trying to bring linux to the &#8220;masses&#8221;, not just sysadmins
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Via <a href="http://onlineapps.newsvine.com/_news/2007/10/04/1002459-vixtaforget-vista">Newsvine &#8211; linux</a>.)</p>
<p>Vixta.org is a Fedora-based Linux distribution designed to be user-friendly and eye-catching, similar in look and feel to Windows Vista. Trying to bring linux to the &#8220;masses&#8221;, not just sysadmins</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://geektimelinux.com/2007/10/04/vixtaforget-vista/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interviews/ColinWalters &#8211; Fedora Project Wiki</title>
		<link>http://geektimelinux.com/2007/10/01/interviewscolinwalters-fedora-project-wiki/</link>
		<comments>http://geektimelinux.com/2007/10/01/interviewscolinwalters-fedora-project-wiki/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 12:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tony</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Distributions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fedora Core]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geektimelinux.com/2007/10/01/interviewscolinwalters-fedora-project-wiki/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(Via Fedora Project Wiki.)
The Online Desktop effort is essentially just a recognition of the fact that more and more people are computing online or &#8220;in the cloud&#8221;. Yahoo! Mail or GMail have completely won in the consumer market over Thunderbird/Evolution type mail, and are in the process of moving into the enterprise. Google Docs and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Via <a href="http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Interviews/ColinWalters">Fedora Project Wiki</a>.)</p>
<p>The Online Desktop effort is essentially just a recognition of the fact that more and more people are computing online or &#8220;in the cloud&#8221;. Yahoo! Mail or GMail have completely won in the consumer market over Thunderbird/Evolution type mail, and are in the process of moving into the enterprise. Google Docs and others like it are quickly growing in the &#8220;basic wordprocessing&#8221; market, and in fact adding new features like extremely simple collaborative editing.</p>
<p><a href="http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Interviews/ColinWalters">Full story</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://geektimelinux.com/2007/10/01/interviewscolinwalters-fedora-project-wiki/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DEBIAN ETCH AND OTHER DEBIAN STUFF!!!</title>
		<link>http://geektimelinux.com/2007/04/30/old413/</link>
		<comments>http://geektimelinux.com/2007/04/30/old413/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Desktop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fedora Core]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Installation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Several years ago, when I was just starting to use Linux, I remember getting a SUSE machine working and I was quite proud.  My second big install was Red Hat and once it was working, I thought I ruled the world.  Things were a little different then, not as much automated install...more hands on.
<p>
My ego was crushed when I attempted to install Debian.  After a few failed attempts, I admitted defeat and went right back to SUSE.  
<p>
Since that time, I have run numerous Linux distributions including all of the popular Debian based distros, SUSE, Fedora and a host of others.  It has been fun and educational (to say the least).
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Several years ago, when I was just starting to use Linux, I remember getting a SUSE machine working and I was quite proud.  My second big install was Red Hat and once it was working, I thought I ruled the world.  Things were a little different then, not as much automated install&#8230;more hands on.</p>
<p>
My ego was crushed when I attempted to install Debian.  After a few failed attempts, I admitted defeat and went right back to SUSE.  </p>
<p>
Since that time, I have run numerous Linux distributions including all of the popular Debian based distros, SUSE, Fedora and a host of others.  It has been fun and educational (to say the least).</p>
<p>
The other night, I had to try Debian again.  This time, I would download <a href="http://www.debian.com"target="new">Debian 4.0</a> and attempt a net install on my old Athlon 1200.  My hope was that I could install the basic Desktop software and find anything else I needed either through Apt-Get or Synaptic (really both one and the same, however the GUI is nice).</p>
<p>
Downloading a 160M .iso is truly a piece-of-cake and burning it to disk was so quick, I felt that I was missing part of the distribution.  Once burned, I booted the old machine with the CD and I immediately got a chill.  There was the DEBIAN logo and I harkened back to the troubles of several years ago.  Knowing that things in this big Linux World just keep getting better, I moved on.</p>
<p>
This installation had much the same feel of a <a href="http://www.ubuntu.com"target="new">UBUNTU</a> install, with the same questions in the same order.  Finally, the system asks which mirror you want to finish your install.  First, let me say that you can stop at this step and have the barest of minimum installs or you can proceed and do as I did&#8230;use the default mirror.</p>
<p><span id="more-413"></span><br />
Once the mirror was selected, the install seemed to purr along at a good speed.  Nothing special, nothing out of the ordinary, just an install.  On a couple of occasions, the install would stop while I answered a question&#8230;one was the screen resolution I wanted and after answering the question, the install resumed.  In all, about 40 minutes from boot to first log in.</p>
<p>
I guess the reason I wanted to share this with you is that there are many people out there that would use the pure DEBIAN system, but have nerves as a result of earlier experiences.  To the Debian team, you have done a good job and are to be commended.</p>
<p>
While a lot of software is installed, there were some codecs, java and other things I wanted, so I went to the <a href="http://www.getautomatix.com/wiki/index.php?title=installation"target="new">Automatix</a> site and downloaded their program for Etch.  While everything did not work, as they reported on their site, the items I felt I was missing installed without flaw.</p>
<p>
I have been working back and forth between Feisty and Etch and both are excellent distributions.  I should also mention that I have a machine running <a href="http://www.mepis.com"target="new">Mepis 6.5</a>, another Debian/Ubuntu based distribution.  The speed and simplicity of all three is amazing and the ability to use configuration tools that are soooooo simple today, compared with the configuration tools of a few years ago is amazing.</p>
<p>
I read daily those that say Linux is Ready/Not Ready for full time disktop use and I am amazed at what this community has done during recent years in the area of advancements.  I see installers that are simple, installs that are almost automatic and program adding/removing as well as configuring that is simple even for the least skilled and I question where the fear that many feel with Linux.  I think there is a certain stigma that continues to haunt Linux and that is the words Ã¢Â€ÂœCOMMAND LINE.Ã¢Â€Â  Based on what I see with many of today&#8217;s  distributions, the Command Line has, for the most part, been replaced by the GUI World and is there for those of us that feel the need to tweak and tune.</p>
<p>
While Vista may be the operating system of beauty (this is based on articles, not real life experience) Linux is the system of stability and trust and is rapidly developing into the distribution of choice! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://geektimelinux.com/2007/04/30/old413/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>up and &#8230;running?</title>
		<link>http://geektimelinux.com/2007/01/05/OLD379/</link>
		<comments>http://geektimelinux.com/2007/01/05/OLD379/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jdaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fedora Core]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, I'm up and running with Fedora Core 6. So "var" I'm liking it. I'm liking it better than my Desktop Ubuntu. I'm really seeing the dif. However due to hardware issues (I believe) of this old laptop, I've had a few system haults. I go to close an application, or simply minimize and I'm dragged back to a login prompt. Even from the command line, if I hit enter, or TAB it throws me back to a login promt. I've been reading and it sounds like it might be related to a video driver. "Who knew?"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I&#8217;m up and running with Fedora Core 6. So &#8220;var&#8221; I&#8217;m liking it. I&#8217;m liking it better than my Desktop Ubuntu. I&#8217;m really seeing the dif. However due to hardware issues (I believe) of this old laptop, I&#8217;ve had a few system haults. I go to close an application, or simply minimize and I&#8217;m dragged back to a login prompt. Even from the command line, if I hit enter, or TAB it throws me back to a login promt. I&#8217;ve been reading and it sounds like it might be related to a video driver. &#8220;Who knew?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://geektimelinux.com/2007/01/05/OLD379/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why do you think the Fedora Legacy project is shutting down long-term Fedora Linux support?</title>
		<link>http://geektimelinux.com/2007/01/03/OLD375/</link>
		<comments>http://geektimelinux.com/2007/01/03/OLD375/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>LoboRI</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fedora Core]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://topix.net/r/0XaAC9CJ7j2c6ML1=2B4Vc=2B5Sl93l1=2BfiAyjcNo3V4KpnwoEXMJaPuhFGcnw6qIej0av1Yi1fh6uEJz9=2Br0n=2FiPvjaH4qmB5rhXESTsP1liWCQ=3D">Why do you think the Fedora Legacy project is shutting down long-term Fedora Linux support?</a> - <i>Lack of contributions from outside programmers 0% Lack of funding 0% Red Hat extending Fedora support from 9 to 13 months, allowing users to upgrade to every second version and get support 0% Oracle's offering ...<br/><a href="http://www.topix.net/forum/link/thread?forum=tech/linux&#038;artsig=6b4eb208a5">Comment</a></i> 
The Fedora Legacy project seems to be shutting down long-term Fedora Linux support to (1) move users to next version for tweaking purposes, reduce maintenance costs, and/or (2) move users to the RedHat versions to get financial support.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://topix.net/r/0XaAC9CJ7j2c6ML1=2B4Vc=2B5Sl93l1=2BfiAyjcNo3V4KpnwoEXMJaPuhFGcnw6qIej0av1Yi1fh6uEJz9=2Br0n=2FiPvjaH4qmB5rhXESTsP1liWCQ=3D">Why do you think the Fedora Legacy project is shutting down long-term Fedora Linux support?</a> &#8211; <i>Lack of contributions from outside programmers 0% Lack of funding 0% Red Hat extending Fedora support from 9 to 13 months, allowing users to upgrade to every second version and get support 0% Oracle&#8217;s offering &#8230;<br/><a href="http://www.topix.net/forum/link/thread?forum=tech/linux&#038;artsig=6b4eb208a5">Comment</a></i><br />
The Fedora Legacy project seems to be shutting down long-term Fedora Linux support to (1) move users to next version for tweaking purposes, reduce maintenance costs, and/or (2) move users to the RedHat versions to get financial support.</p>
<p>Not sure that it is a smart move.  FC6 requires too much ram, updated hardware when they could be making real inroads on the Microsoft domination.  </p>
<p>I really like FC5 and FC6 looked good but too much of the hardware out in the business market is not ready for either FC6 or Vista (ugh, even hate to say the word.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://geektimelinux.com/2007/01/03/OLD375/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Backing Up and Restoring Using the cpio Command in Linux and Unix</title>
		<link>http://geektimelinux.com/2006/05/26/OLD307/</link>
		<comments>http://geektimelinux.com/2006/05/26/OLD307/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>david23</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fedora Core]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How-Tos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libranet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linspire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lycoris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mandrake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simply Mepis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SuSE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ubuntu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xandros]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yoper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The cpio command is one of the most commonly used Linux back up tools. 

The cpio command has two unusual features

Unlike tar , in which the files to back up are typed in as part of the command, cpio reads the files to work with from the standard input (in other words, the screen). 

This feature means that cpio must be used as part of a multiple command or with a redirection pipe. Examples of this usage are shown in the tables below. 

cpio must always be used with one of three flags. Flags are options that set the mode in which the command runs. Only one flag can be used at a time, and it must come before any other options. In addition, the choice of flags limits the options that can be used. Each flag also has a gnu option that can used in its place. The gnu option gives a convenient name for each flag: extract, create, and pass- through.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The cpio command is one of the most commonly used Linux back up tools. </p>
<p>The cpio command has two unusual features</p>
<p>Unlike tar , in which the files to back up are typed in as part of the command, cpio reads the files to work with from the standard input (in other words, the screen). </p>
<p>This feature means that cpio must be used as part of a multiple command or with a redirection pipe. Examples of this usage are shown in the tables below. </p>
<p>cpio must always be used with one of three flags. Flags are options that set the mode in which the command runs. Only one flag can be used at a time, and it must come before any other options. In addition, the choice of flags limits the options that can be used. Each flag also has a gnu option that can used in its place. The gnu option gives a convenient name for each flag: extract, create, and pass- through.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.debianhelp.co.uk/cpiocommand.htm">Read Full article here</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://geektimelinux.com/2006/05/26/OLD307/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Taking backup using tar command in linux and unix</title>
		<link>http://geektimelinux.com/2006/04/18/OLD297/</link>
		<comments>http://geektimelinux.com/2006/04/18/OLD297/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>david23</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fedora Core]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How-Tos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libranet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linspire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lycoris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mandrake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simply Mepis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SuSE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ubuntu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xandros]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yoper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The tar backup program is an archiving program designed to store and extract files from an archive file known as a tarfile. A tarfile may be made on a tape drive; however, it is also common to write a tarfile to a normal file. 

<a href="http://www.debianhelp.co.uk/tarbackup.htm">Read Full article here</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The tar backup program is an archiving program designed to store and extract files from an archive file known as a tarfile. A tarfile may be made on a tape drive; however, it is also common to write a tarfile to a normal file. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.debianhelp.co.uk/tarbackup.htm">Read Full article here</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://geektimelinux.com/2006/04/18/OLD297/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Parallels Workstation 2.1 Offers Superior Hardware Support, New Interface, Full Support for Intel VT-d, Free Upgrade</title>
		<link>http://geektimelinux.com/2006/03/23/OLD292/</link>
		<comments>http://geektimelinux.com/2006/03/23/OLD292/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jmarans</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fedora Core]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mandrake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SuSE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ubuntu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xandros]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<b>HERNDON, Virginia Ã¢Â€Â“ March 22nd, 2006 Ã¢Â€Â“</b> Parallels, Inc. today announced the general availability of version 2.1 of its desktop virtualization software, Parallels Workstation.  The upgraded version delivers faster performance, better stability, and stronger isolation of virtual machines.<br /><br />

Additional improvements and new features in the popular, easy-to-use, cost-effective virtualization software include:
-	A completely re-designed interface
-	Better hardware support, including USB and wireless networking support, and support for PAE-enabled machines
-	Better functionality, including the ability to suspend and resume VM (virtual machine) activity, a new Ã¢Â€Âœcompact hard diskÃ¢Â€Â feature that helps users manage available hard disk resources, and a more robust tools package that lets users personalize their experience
-	Primary and guest support for SUSE Linux 10 
-	Guest OS support for Sun Solaris.  
-	Improved performance for guest OS/2 virtual machines]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>HERNDON, Virginia Ã¢Â€Â“ March 22nd, 2006 Ã¢Â€Â“</b> Parallels, Inc. today announced the general availability of version 2.1 of its desktop virtualization software, Parallels Workstation.  The upgraded version delivers faster performance, better stability, and stronger isolation of virtual machines.</p>
<p>Additional improvements and new features in the popular, easy-to-use, cost-effective virtualization software include:<br />
-	A completely re-designed interface<br />
-	Better hardware support, including USB and wireless networking support, and support for PAE-enabled machines<br />
-	Better functionality, including the ability to suspend and resume VM (virtual machine) activity, a new Ã¢Â€Âœcompact hard diskÃ¢Â€Â feature that helps users manage available hard disk resources, and a more robust tools package that lets users personalize their experience<br />
-	Primary and guest support for SUSE Linux 10<br />
-	Guest OS support for Sun Solaris.<br />
-	Improved performance for guest OS/2 virtual machines</p>
<p>A complete list of Workstation 2.1Ã¢Â€Â™s new features and functions is available at http://www.parallels.com/en/products/workstation/21/newfeatures/.</p>
<p>Ã¢Â€ÂœParallels Workstation 2.1 is everything you need in a virtualization solution; it offers superlative performance, stability and ease of use, and on top of that, it is by far the most cost-effective solution available,Ã¢Â€Â said Benjamin Rudolph, ParallelsÃ¢Â€Â™ Marketing Manager.  Ã¢Â€ÂœThis releaseÃ¢Â€Â™s impressive performance, feature set and industry-leading, low price point, coupled with free upgrades for current customers and responsive support, reinforce our across-the-board commitment to building virtualization solutions that work for anyone, regardless of computer savvy or budget.Ã¢Â€Â </p>
<p>Additionally, Parallels announced that future versions of Parallels virtualization products will offer full support for IntelÃ¢Â€Â™s next generation of hardware virtualization technology, Intel Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d), which extends virtualization support into the platform by making it possible to robustly assign IO devices to virtual machines (VMs) in a virtualized system. This enables devices to be driven Ã¢Â€ÂœdirectlyÃ¢Â€Â by the native/physical driver when assigned to a virtual machine, resulting in significantly faster virtual machine performance. </p>
<p>Ã¢Â€ÂœIntel is delivering relevant innovations for virtualization solution providers including Intel Virtualization Technology for CPU (VTx) and Directed IO (VTd), Dual Core microprocessors and Intel(R) Core(R) Microarchitecture,Ã¢Â€Âœ said David Tuhy, General Manager of Intel&#8217;s Desktop Products Division. &#8220;Parallels has taken full advantage of VTx in Parallels Workstation 2.1, and we look forward to continued collaboration with Parallels on enabling new platform capabilities such as VTd which will help improve the reliability, performance and flexibility of I/O devices on virtual machines.Ã¢Â€Â</p>
<p>As part of the companyÃ¢Â€Â™s ongoing efforts to build powerful products that meet any IT budget, Parallels is offering registered Workstation 2.0 customers a free upgrade to version 2.1.  Registered users will be receiving an email with instructions on how to receive their 2.1 permanent license key. </p>
<p>New users can purchase licenses at the industry-leading low price of $49.99 directly through the companyÃ¢Â€Â™s online store at www.parallels.com/buyonline.  New users are also welcome to download and evaluate a free, fully functional 15-day trial by visiting the Parallels Download Center at www.parallels.com/download.  </p>
<p><b>About Parallels</b><br />
Parallels is server and workstation virtualization solutions company committed to building powerful, user friendly, cost-effective products that can be used by anyone, from an experienced developer to a computer Ã¢Â€ÂœnewbieÃ¢Â€Â to improve efficiency, lower hardware costs, and reduce operating expenses. The companyÃ¢Â€Â™s products all feature hypervisor technology for strong, stable virtual machines, and an intuitive web-like interface that facilitates zero-training operation.  Additionally, Parallels solutions fully support Intel Virtualization Technology architecture, which is optimized to provide superior virtual machine performance. The company is rapidly growing and employs a global team of experienced technical and business professionals.  For more information, please visit www.parallels.com. </p>
<p><b>Media/Analyst Contact</b><br />
Benjamin H. Rudolph<br />
Marketing Manager, Parallels<br />
703.234.5549 (direct) <br />
202.437.6701 (mobile) <br />
ben.rudolph@parallels.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://geektimelinux.com/2006/03/23/OLD292/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fedora Core 3 Review</title>
		<link>http://geektimelinux.com/2004/11/13/OLD38/</link>
		<comments>http://geektimelinux.com/2004/11/13/OLD38/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tony</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Distributions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fedora Core]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These days, you can nearly mark the seasons by the distribution releases in the Linux world. To "keep up with the Joneses," the major distribution manufacturers seem to set release dates closer and closer with each cycle. With <a href="http://www.suse.com/us/index.html">Suse</a>, <a href="http://www.mandrakelinux.com/en-us/">Mandrake</a> and <a href="http://fedora.redhat.com/">Fedora</a> all releasing new versions in the past month, we're clearly into the winter release season.

It seems that everyone has an opinion these days on Fedora. As parent <a href="http://www.redhat.com/">Red Hat</a> has moved further into the enterprise, the Linux hardcore - once the Red Hat backbone - have drifted a bit to other distributions that they see (right or wrong) as closer to the roots. For all that, the Fedora community is alive and well, releasing new versions with substantial changes and upgrades. Stacked on the rich code base of Red Hat, Fedora has managed to stay out at the front edge of Linux distributions that are easy to install, easy to maintain and a real pleasure to use.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These days, you can nearly mark the seasons by the distribution releases in the Linux world. To &#8220;keep up with the Joneses,&#8221; the major distribution manufacturers seem to set release dates closer and closer with each cycle. With <a href="http://www.suse.com/us/index.html">Suse</a>, <a href="http://www.mandrakelinux.com/en-us/">Mandrake</a> and <a href="http://fedora.redhat.com/">Fedora</a> all releasing new versions in the past month, we&#8217;re clearly into the winter release season.</p>
<p>It seems that everyone has an opinion these days on Fedora. As parent <a href="http://www.redhat.com/">Red Hat</a> has moved further into the enterprise, the Linux hardcore &#8211; once the Red Hat backbone &#8211; have drifted a bit to other distributions that they see (right or wrong) as closer to the roots. For all that, the Fedora community is alive and well, releasing new versions with substantial changes and upgrades. Stacked on the rich code base of Red Hat, Fedora has managed to stay out at the front edge of Linux distributions that are easy to install, easy to maintain and a real pleasure to use.<br />
<!--break--></p>
<p>I&#8217;ll quickly confess to having been a long-time Red Hat/Fedora user, extending back to the pre-Red Hat 6.0 days. I&#8217;ve not always been thrilled with what I&#8217;ve seen. 6.2 just wasn&#8217;t up to snuff. 7.0 was a mess. Red Hat 9 really stepped up the pace of Linux on the desktop, though, and the Fedora project has managed to extend that with every release.</p>
<p>Fedora Core 3 is no exception. The changes in FC3 are substantial though subtle. There&#8217;s the inclusion of <a href="http://www.gnome.org/">Gnome 2.8</a>. There&#8217;s the addition of SELinux for security. There are the latest 2.6 kernel upgrades. Overall, this is a very nice improvement over an already strong distribution.</p>
<p>The most significant of the changes is the addition of <a href="http://fedora.redhat.com/docs/selinux-faq-fc3/">SELinux</a> for security. Fedora has had firewall capabilities throughout its version, a legacy of the firewall app in Red Hat 9. But, anyone who&#8217;s used it will admit that it&#8217;s pretty basic. The default tool allows a user to select trusted protocols, trusted interfaces, or selected ports. SELinux, on the other hand, allows a user to drill down much more deeply into the services that can leave your system vulnerable. And, of course, it&#8217;s easy to configure from the Applications->System Settings->Security Level menu. To me, the addition of SELinux points to a deeper future focus on the home desktop, where there&#8217;s no IT department to protect systems at a higher level. The tool is robust and easy to configure, making it much more likely that home users will be able to effectively lock down the security of their systems.</p>
<p>Fedora now also includes the <a href="https://player.helixcommunity.org/">Helix</a> player as an installation option. If you&#8217;re unfamiliar with Helix, they&#8217;re the open source developers for Real. Helix is a multimedia player in the mold of RealPlayer. The developers have also released <a href="https://player.helixcommunity.org/2004/unix/">RealPlayer 10 for Linux</a>, though it&#8217;s not included in the Fedora installation package. The addition of Helix also helps further Fedora Core down the path toward a truly friendly and consumer ready home desktop system. Like the other changes, that addition isn&#8217;t huge news by itself. In the aggregate, though, they provide an interesting view of the future focus of Fedora.</p>
<p>Gnome 2.8 has some changes, as well, though they don&#8217;t represent an overhaul of my personal favorite desktop environment. Customized themes can now be saved. There are some changes to the underlying filesystem manager, Nautilus, that make it a bit easier to graphically navigate the filesystem. And, the ability to mount remote drives has gotten easier. Overall, though, it feels as though Gnome 2.8 is operating on a much more efficient code base. It&#8217;s quick, quick, quick, even on my 800 Mhz PIII desktop machine. Short of version 2.0, Gnome has always been my desktop. The changes in 2.8 further the loyalty of anyone who&#8217;s used the desktop enviornment over any period of time.</p>
<p>Another addition in Fedora Core 3 is the <a href="http://xfce.org/">XFCE</a> desktop. In the sense that it offers further flexibility, that&#8217;s a plus. I installed XFCE and gave it whirl. Honestly, I didn&#8217;t think much of it. Yes, it&#8217;s even more lightweight than Gnome or KDE. However, the overall look and feel isn&#8217;t nearly as polished. And, the applications aren&#8217;t as easily accessed as within either of the major desktops. If Fedora was looking to expand on the desktop possibilities by providing a lightweight option, I&#8217;d much rather have seen the Fluxbox desktop environment as the third alternative.</p>
<p>The installation is exactly what we&#8217;ve come to expect from Red Hat/Fedora. On my 800 Mhz machine, the entire installation took less than 45 minutes, from working desktop to working desktop. Every device worked out of the box &#8211; video, sound, mouse, usb hub, card reader, printer, and camera. It&#8217;s really a mark of the Fedora science of installation that there&#8217;s nothing of significance to talk about. It just works and works well.</p>
<p>In the winter release season, we&#8217;ve seen some strong contenders. SuSE&#8217;s new release is strong &#8211; and soon to be followed by the Novell Desktop distribution. Mandrake continues to refine what might be the prettiest distribution of the three majors. Other smaller distributions &#8211; Mepis and Ubuntu, in particular &#8211; are beginning to make some real headway in the Linux space. Fedora, though, remains the leader. For ease of installation, ease of use, pace of development, and community support, a Linux user simply can&#8217;t go wrong with a Fedora Core 3 installation. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://geektimelinux.com/2004/11/13/OLD38/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FEDORA CORE 2</title>
		<link>http://geektimelinux.com/2004/08/11/OLD3/</link>
		<comments>http://geektimelinux.com/2004/08/11/OLD3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Desktop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fedora Core]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How-Tos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Installation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An interesting thing happened on the way to the computer the other night.  I ran across an old friend.  He was wearing his Fedora and it caused me to remember the many hours we had spent together.  I had been using FEDORA CORE 1 when the announcement of CORE 2 was made and I couldn't wait to download the new .iso.

I rushed to www.redhat.com.  Picked the FEDORA site and after a couple of attempts, was able to get on a mirror and get the download to my hard drive.  I then transferred them to cds and within a half hour, I was up and running FEDORA CORE 2.

As I began to think about the hours that had been spent with Red Hat and later Core 1, I opened the cd-rom on one of my machines, dropped in Disc 1 and rebooted.  There it was, the familiar markings of the Anaconda installer.  As the install began, I realized that I had answered some of the questions without even reading them.  Keyboard-English...Language-English...Remove all Linux Partitions-Yes.  Simplicity would dictate that the default install be performed, but I chose CUSTOM.  The reason was to install the KDE desktop during the initial installation.  In addition, I wanted to be able to do some Windows file sharing on our home network.  Selections made, it was time to settle back and watch my old friend work.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An interesting thing happened on the way to the computer the other night.  I ran across an old friend.  He was wearing his Fedora and it caused me to remember the many hours we had spent together.  I had been using FEDORA CORE 1 when the announcement of CORE 2 was made and I couldn&#8217;t wait to download the new .iso.</p>
<p>I rushed to www.redhat.com.  Picked the FEDORA site and after a couple of attempts, was able to get on a mirror and get the download to my hard drive.  I then transferred them to cds and within a half hour, I was up and running FEDORA CORE 2.</p>
<p>As I began to think about the hours that had been spent with Red Hat and later Core 1, I opened the cd-rom on one of my machines, dropped in Disc 1 and rebooted.  There it was, the familiar markings of the Anaconda installer.  As the install began, I realized that I had answered some of the questions without even reading them.  Keyboard-English&#8230;Language-English&#8230;Remove all Linux Partitions-Yes.  Simplicity would dictate that the default install be performed, but I chose CUSTOM.  The reason was to install the KDE desktop during the initial installation.  In addition, I wanted to be able to do some Windows file sharing on our home network.  Selections made, it was time to settle back and watch my old friend work.</p>
<p>About 15 minutes later, the message flashed that it was time to remove any install media and reboot.  The  install was just about complete.</p>
<p>Upon rebooting, another couple of questions ; time, sound card detection and test and I was ready to log in.  Simple, complete and without a hitch.</p>
<p>Once logged in, I immediately logged onto the internet and went to www.freshrpms.com.  Once there, I selected Ã¢Â€ÂœAPTÃ¢Â€Â.  For those not familiar with Ã¢Â€ÂœAPTÃ¢Â€Â it is a program, that provides updates for everything available for Core.  My download was to my home directory.  While there, I also downloaded Ã¢Â€ÂœSYNAPTIC.Ã¢Â€Â  This is a GUI that can be used for installing and removing selected packages.</p>
<p>Once both packages were in my home directory, I opened a console (Red Hat>System Tools>Console).  With console opened, I changed to Root User. (su..enter..and password)  Once I had Root privileges, I did an ls.  (ls is to Linux what dir: is to DOS)</p>
<p>If you have never used the RPM (Red Hat Package Manager) before, you will find it quite simple.  From root, type: rpm -i (name of package).  For simplicity, highlight the package in the directory by moving your cursor over it with the left button depressed.  Copy this to where the package is called for on the above line.  Press enter and  the Package Manager will begin installing the program.</p>
<p>Once installed, type: apt-get update. (all lower case)  This will give you several messages and return you to root.  Next, type: apt-upgrade.  At this time, you might as well go to the refrigerator and get a soda as this is going to take a little while.  What is happening is the apt package is scanning all programs in your system and upgrading them (as needed).</p>
<p>When this is complete, your system should have the latest and greatest.  One of the upgrades was Mozilla.  After running apt-get, I was on version 1.7.2.  Previously, I had 1.6.</p>
<p>Next, if you intend to spend time on the internet, it is good to download Java.  First, before leaving the console, type exit.  This should take you from root to standard user.  Once there, type mkdir (make directory) java.  Hit enter and when you do ls (remember&#8230;checking directory) you should see a new directory called java.</p>
<p>While there are dozens of places to go to download java, I usually use: www.pikeus.freeserve.co.uk.  Once there, you will see Ã¢Â€Âœdownload java for mozillaÃ¢Â€Â listed on the right side.  Once selected, you will be given two options&#8230;a zip file and a java file.  I usually pass on the zip file, although it should install java in your mozilla directory.  Sometimes it does&#8230;sometimes it doesn&#8217;t!!!</p>
<p>I click on the download, am taken to another screen, select downloads and then  am ask if I would like the rpm or self extracting.  I have always used the self extracting and will work with it here.  Once selected, your program manager will ask where you want the file to appear.  Double click on java, which should put it in a directory as: /home/(dir name)/java.</p>
<p>Once this is downloaded, close the browser and go to the console.  At the console, type: cd  /home/(dir name)/java.</p>
<p>This is where you will find your downloaded material.  </p>
<p>Again, su to root.</p>
<p>Next you will see the file, however there are some changes to make prior to having a working java installation.  First, type: chmod a+x (file name).  Again, simplicity dictates that you copy the file name.  Now you will have a file with a .bin extention.  Use the following combination: ./(file name).  This should start the install process.  Use the space bar (after you see the agreement start printing) and at the end, you will be ask: YES or NO.  Type yes and the install will take place.</p>
<p>CONGRATULATIONS:  You have now made it to the bonus round!  This is where your hard work pays off.  We not create a symlink that will put java in the plugins directory of your browser.  Ready?  Here goes.</p>
<p>Do ls  (enter.)  You will see a directory highlighted in blue.  Now type the following and I am going to use Sam as the name of the home directory for illustration purposes.</p>
<p>ln -s /home/sam/java/(insert file directory)/plugin/i386/ns610-gcc32/libjavaplugin_oji.so /usr/lib/mozilla-1.7.2/plugins/libjavaplugin_oji.so.  If you have everything alright, you should be able to type exit twice and be returned to your background screen.</p>
<p>Click on your browser, as if to go on the internet.  In the tool bar (where the address to your home page is displayed) delete the address and type: about:plugins and enter.</p>
<p>This will display the plugins in your browser and you should see java prominently displayed.</p>
<p>While this seems quite difficult the first time, it is a very easy install.</p>
<p>Give it a try.  There are dozens of places for help, if you need it,  including this site.  The Red Hat FEDORA project is growing rapidly and FEDORA is on the cutting edge of Linux technology.   </p>
<p>As for me, I&#8217;m going to sit back with the guy in the FEDORA and enjoy some stable Linux computing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://geektimelinux.com/2004/08/11/OLD3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
